When possible, researchers claim to take measures to prevent or minimize suffering, but there are times when providing, say, an anesthetic will change the interaction of the drug being tested. And plz stop calling people names! Anoymous - 7-Mar Samster - 2-May 1: It is a dangerous product for animals to have, but think of the millions of lives that have been improved or saved because of the drug.
In order Animal research pros do so, they have publicized a number of animal tests that were urgently distasteful to the public, even if they were not examples of the norm in research: Data discrepancies are not the only issue that face animal research transitioning to human research.
Some animals are almost carbon copies of humans.
It is the process of animal testing that is done under the guise of research to benefit humanity, but the applied research may have little or no concern to the animals involved.
This is because they carefully choose animals whose rights do not fall under the jurisdiction of the AWA. They have saved lots of us by testing on animals.
Any long-term research involves mice and rats because of this unique aspect to the research. I would rather you test it on me, instead of poor animals. In many countries, the average life expectancy of a human exceeds 70 years of age.
Paul Perv - Jun 3: These types of treatments are often put on the back burner. A cell line from cervical cancer cells taken in is still being researched, even though the individual died from that cancer in the same year. I agree with Elly, would you want to get tested on?
This can cause very misleading results. What Are the Pros of Animal Research? Animals deserve to have a life, just like we do. Another diversion from accurate test results is that since the animals are in an unnatural environment, their bodies will be under stress and may not react to the test drugs in the same way they would in a natural environment.
Testing humans with invasive experiments could result in death. Do the pros outweigh the cons of animal testing? So they ARE doing a good job, and you need to shut up.
The product may harm or benefit the animal, but not a human. It may not offer valid results. Two because it would probably cost even more than animal testing does. How do you feel about the process of animal research? Certain companies breed animals solely for this purpose.
It is like eating meat the animal died to benefit us. Keep it civil, please.
The substance being tested may well prove to be lethal for the animals, or the conditions during their captivity may lead to their deaths. If the human benefit seems to outweigh the costs of the animal lives, then the only allowable animal experiments must provide the greatest of human benefit.
Student - Feb 7: According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12, animals.
That means animal research can be more unreliable than even researchers claim it may be. It provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle.
The animal tests serve as a precursor to the commencing trial tests done on humans.
There are protections in place for the animals. That means there are more than 20 million animals who could be at a high risk of abuse or neglect in the name of research. There are drugs and products that could be harmful to animals, but highly beneficial to humans, and the current state of research priority would make it extremely difficult to know if this was the case.
I disagree with animal testing because it an kill them. If a test fails,the animal could die, and that just shows that scientists do not care for animals.Cons of Animal Research Using animals in research is a costly methodology.
Often it is not even possible without the companies or organizations asking. Pros and Cons of Animal Testing Animal testing is used in many different industries, mainly medical and cosmetic. Animals are used in order to ensure the products are safe for the use of humans.
The pros and cons of animal testing are both important to understand but unfortunately, neither offers a definitive answer to please everyone.
Well honestly think about it this way antibotics cure (almost) any bacteral infection, an.
The pros and cons of animal research will always be controversial. Testing animals to see if a product is safe may be better than testing humans first, but that also means the life of an animal is devalued.
Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.
Defending animal research.
Despite a life-threatening attack against him, J. David Jentsch remains an outspoken proponent of research with animals, emphasizing that the work is needed to save human lives.Download