People from all over the world migrate to Europe, ranging from Americans to Brazilians to Kenyans to Japanese to Fijians. Globalization allows further colonization which impacts intellectual property and cultural rights. On the other hand, it has the ability to disempower people by misrepresentationprovide a process for further colonizationand propel the loss of individualism and self and group identity.
Just look at the outpouring of cultural diversity that sprang up with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Multinational corporations view indigenous land as a valuable commodity to be bought, sold, and exploited.
With this comes an erosion of cultural hierarchy as the sense of identity becomes more of a personal, individual choice, rather than a societal one. For the first time in history, your morning cappuccino is the same no matter whether you are sipping it in Tokyo, New York, Bangkok or Buenos Aires.
Impact on Education Globalization has impacted education which is now available to remote cultures that previously did not have access. Those who are predisposed to commit Does globalization destroy cultural diversity crimes substitute such acts with pornography as it becomes more widely available.
Europe itself is full of many native groups ranging from national groups British, Russian, French, Greek, German, etc. Similarly when someone had the idea to stretch a vine between the ends of a bent stick the first bow was born and you can be sure the first arrow soon followed.
Adolescents are far more susceptible to targeted consumerism and, as a result, may find that western consumer ideals may be more appealing to them than their own cultural traditions.
Diversity has become valued internationally, and is promoted through international organizations. An exemplary country of cultural diversity is Canada. The advancement of technology dissolves international boundaries and opens cultures to a whole new arena Smith,enabling globalization to occur.
Many indigenous see globalization as a threat to the traditional family structure, creating a disconnect from cultural traditions. Instead, it looks to further the interests of the larger, more influential countries and corporations which are the impetus behind its spread. Of course, it is not just Starbucks.
One needs only to scan newspapers or magazines to find large photo spreads of people investing scarce resources in attempts to maintain the status quo. The Plains Apaches nation, for example, is a group who used technology to preserve their language, culture and customs after striking a special culture committee which took action against a society which was in jeopardy of fading Prins, Macedonia and Montenegro are examples.
It can become a platform to mobilize ideas, viewpoints, campaigns and strategies to protect and cultivate interests and garner political power. It is easy to see this homogenization in terms of loss of diversity, identity or the westernization of society.
This trait, which I outline in my book Wired for Culture, makes us stand alone amongst all other animals.
Thus, early in our history most of us lived in small bands of maybe 50 to people. Diverse people will be brought together who have little common cultural identity of the sort that historically has prompted our cultural nepotism, and this will happen at rates that exceed those at which they can be culturally integrated.
Not having access to technologies that are present in the classroom, combined with an education system geared toward the dominant society can be a lethal combination for non-dominant cultures.
Once the culture of an organization shifts from a narrowly defined identity to one of cultural inclusiveness, a sustainable and successful model of global diversity is achieved.
Cooperation has worked throughout history because large collections of people have been able to use resources more effectively and provide greater prosperity and protection than smaller groups. This creates what is known as a mono-culture — one ideology, one culture and a homogeneous pool where society resides Smith, Misrepresentationstereotyping and the risk of loss of cultural and intellectual property rights are the consequences of unmonitored access.
Also, this use of tradition for entertainment simply commercializes the local culture to the point where its significance may be compromised.How does globalization impact cultural diversity?
Thanks for the A2A. I hesitate to over-simplify this complex area of inquiry, but at a broad general level, the essence of it is that it brings different cultures together. Any time two cultures come into contact, it. It is undeniable that globalization can and has and will diminish or destroy certain cultures, traditions, and enterprises.
Yet as Miller and others remind us in, we are not powerless in our. In examining this text, I hope to show that globalisation truly does pose a threat to cultural diversity.
In this essay, globalisation will be used as an umbrella term to describe the increased economic, cultural and political interdependence of the globe's nation-states and their peoples. Globalization and Cultural Diversity Those who oppose globalization are especially sensitive about loss of culture.
But the American film industry does not contribute to the homogenization or Americanization of culture, argues Michael Lynton, chairman and CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Against this backdrop the seemingly unstoppable and ever accelerating cultural homogenization around the world brought about by travel, the internet and social networking, although often decried, is probably a good thing even if it means the loss of cultural diversity: it increases our sense of togetherness via the sense of a shared culture.
It is undeniable that globalization can and has and will diminish or destroy certain cultures, traditions, and enterprises.
Yet as Miller and others remind us in, we are not powerless in our response, whether as creators or consumers.
Indeed, globalization also presents a tremendous opportunity for cultural diversity.Download