How effectively did tudor governments deal

In some areas these strategies and tactics worked better in some areas than others; Irish rebellions were generally more costly and more difficult to suppress. The support of the nobility was crucial to maintaining control of the localities and additionally, noble support of a rebellion could increase the risk of a rebellion overthrowing the monarch.

However despite the apparent success of these, they only challenged government reputation, rather than authority. Extraordinary taxation was a prime cause of rebellion at the start of the reign where the risk of war under Henry VII led to the Yorkshire and Cornish rebellions in which the rebels refused to pay to defend against foreign invasion.

Therefore it is clear that the peoples of England had more to gain by supporting the Tudor monarchy throughout and therefore when rebellions arose, they would be comfortably countered and pose less of a challenge, however such policies were not established in Ireland leaving that area open to greater instability.

Tudor governments also succeeded in limiting the success of several rebellions as soon as they had started by limiting the extent to which the rebels could achieve their aims.

He made the ten year-old Lambert How effectively did tudor governments deal a servant in his kitchen and even allowed Perkin Warbeck to become a courtier. Therefore it is clear that indeed, the aims of nobles during their rebellions did indeed change considerably throughout.

This was also an unusually lenient punishment for Elizabeth to exact as she, like her father favoured harsh punishments for rebels.

Additionally, the Tudors increasingly tackled the risk of rebellion enclosure presented with increasing anti-enclosure laws inand In Tudor England pre-emptive tactics worked well to limit the danger posed by future rebellions, but the actions taken in Ireland to encourage locals to assist the Crown largely failed due to the harsh rule of martial law which increased the hostility of Irish rebels towards occupying English officials.

After his rebellion the Tudors chose to reduce the power of the Irish nobility and increase English plantations; thus the Fitzgerald rebellion of and the Geraldine wanted to promote the cause of their own clans in this environment.

However, in a majority of cases, the harsh punishment seemed to be more effective in preventing future Tudor rebellions. The use of pre-emptive measures was an effective tactic used by Tudor governments to deal with rebellions.

Additionally, Factionalism was the principle cause of all the Irish Rebellions. However, the latter Tudor Governments introduced various social reforms to tackle with the cause and consequences of this.

At the accession of Henry VII, his throne was unstable therefore he ran the risk of leading nobles attempting to overthrow him; indeed Lord Lovell and the Stafford brothers all attempted it in and Simnel and Warbeck were aided by various nobility from England and the Earl of Kildare from Ireland, thus Nobility were a huge threat to the Tudors since some were keen to dethrone Henry at his weak stage.

Wednesday, 15 September How effectively did Tudor governments deal with the problem of rebellion? Likewise similar incidents of lack of noble cooperation can bee seen in the rebellions ofand The use of pre-emptive measures was also largely effective in preventing the threat of future rebellions, however it could still be argued that longer term policy changes were perhaps more effective as offering a long term solution to insurrection.

Equally, Elizabeth had acted quickly when she heard rumours of insurrection that sought to depose William Cecil, secure the succession of Mary Queen of Scots and marry her to the Duke of Norfolk. This was due to the likely contribution of funds to bolster supplies and troops with the involvement of retainers and experienced foreign mercenaries.

Long-term changes to government policy ensured that rebellions occurred less frequently as the period progressed. Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of and Edward required the churches to administer poor relief after the rebellion but Elizabeth brought in more effective reforms inand which required parishes to not only pay for the legitimate poor, but to provide them with the raw materials for a job as well.

In addition to this the reforms made to local government, policies directly implemented by central government and the effects of trials and retribution, such as Henry VIIs concessions made to the late 15th century pretenders, Lambert Simnell and Perkin Warbeck and later in the period during Elizabeths reign, who recognised rebel Shane ONeil as Earl of Tyrone, all contributed to the reduction in the frequency and scale of English rebellions.

This led to economic problems being significant in the Pilgrimage of Grace in where one article focused on enclosure and came to a head in the rebellions which both had enclosures as a principle cause.Jun 17,  · Assess the reasons why Tudor governments were able to deal with popular disorder so effectively Why did mark a tyrning-point in the frequency of rebelllions in England in the period from to ?

5.

Questions - Paragraphs Flashcards Preview

How effectively did Tudor governments deal with rebellions in England and Ireland? 6. Assess the importance of the clergy in maintaining political stability in Tudor England.

How Did Tudor Governments Respond To Rebellion 1.

How Effectively Did Tudor Governments Deal with Rebellion in England and Ireland?

How did Tudor Governments respond to rebellion? 2. Buy TimeTudor governments had limited resources available to them e.g.

no police force and limited moneyTheir main weapon was their claim to be legitimate ruler anointed with holy oil and chosen by GodTherefore traitors were also. How effectively did Tudor governments deal with rebellion in England and Ireland? Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning shown through the decline in rebellion after only 5 English rebellions occurred as opposed to 10 before 8.

How far did Tudor government and administration change in the s? 9. How effectively did the governments of Edward VI and Mary I deal with unrest? How important was Thomas Cromwell in influencing religious policy in the s? Mark Scheme: mi-centre.com (page 19) June 5. Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning.

Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of and

Download
How effectively did tudor governments deal
Rated 5/5 based on 79 review